Product Security That Holds Up Under Real Pressure 

Yes. Assessments can cover models, agents, RAG pipelines, and AI-powered product features, with testing tailored to how each feature accesses data and takes action. Testing covers prompt injection, data leakage, and whether agents stay within user permissions and authorized actions, with findings mapped to OWASP and MITRE ATLAS. Pre-production threat modeling informs design decisions, while adversarial testing evaluates how protections hold up in practice.

For program-level questions like governance, policy, and where to test first, our AI Security Program Assessment evaluates organizational practices.

We plan testing around how your team develops and releases software. Assessments can target changes to authentication, APIs, data access, and other priority features, follow a recurring schedule, or bring dedicated practitioners into your development process. Capacity flexes with your forecasts and shifts around release dates and testing freezes, including urgent tests ahead of an accelerated launch. At one Fortune 100 technology company, testing ranges from 40 to 80 consultant-weeks a quarter as release schedules and seasonal demand change.

In recurring engagements, practitioners build knowledge of your architecture over time, and scope each assessment around what changed since the last one. Findings are timed to inform release decisions, with follow-up testing scoped to validate fixes.

Reports document scope, testing methods, findings, and remediation guidance. Attestation letters summarize testing for customer reviews without exposing full findings, and retests confirm fixes.

Findings can be mapped to SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HITRUST, and other requirements, while ongoing defensive engagements provide evidence of detection coverage and response performance.

Testing is CREST-accredited, which enterprise customers often ask of their software vendors, and we agree on deliverables and dates up front so evidence is ready before reviews and audits.

Testing starts with an agreed scope and rules of engagement that reflect your service availability and tenant isolation requirements. Together, we define target systems, testing windows, operational limits, stop conditions, and points of contact. 

We select production or staging environments based on the assessment goals and agree on how to handle sensitive data and potential service impact. Using test tenants you provision, we probe cross-tenant access and privilege escalation without touching customer data. When code and data must stay in your systems, testing runs entirely inside your environment.

Yes. Before testing or monitoring begins, we agree with your team on who owns triage, escalation, containment, and test coordination, whether you need additional testing capacity, dedicated detection engineering, or 24/7 monitoring and response. Named practitioners work within your existing tools and processes. At one Fortune 100 technology company, UltraViolet completes the required annual assessments so the internal team can focus on adversary emulation and red teaming, and our findings hold up to that team's technical review.

Offense informs defense. Defense sharpens offense. Red findings become blue detections, whether your SOC or ours acts on them, and blue telemetry sharpens red tradecraft. Purple team exercises validate the improvements with your team.