Threat Advisory: Chrome Sandbox Escape CVE-2025-2783

Executive Snapshot

The exploitation of Chrome zero-day CVE-2025-2783 underscores how trusted software can become an unexpected entry point for espionage-grade attacks. By breaking Chrome’s sandbox protections, state-sponsored attackers demonstrated that even widely deployed browsers can be weaponized to deliver spyware through legitimate web interactions. This campaign’s precision, stealth, and use of commercial surveillance tools make it a critical concern for organizations across all sectors, as it exposes the fragility of everyday software trust boundaries. To strengthen defenses and reduce exposure to similar attacks, organizations should take immediate action:

Apply browser updates without delay: Ensure all Chrome and Chromium-based browsers across enterprise systems are updated to the latest patched versions that remediate CVE-2025-2783 and related vulnerabilities.

Enforce browser isolation and domain filtering: Implement controlled browsing environments and block access to suspicious or short-lived domains that could serve malicious payloads.

Enhance endpoint and behavioral detection: Monitor for unusual process behavior such as handle duplication, COM hijacking, or privilege escalation attempts that indicate sandbox escape activity.

Strengthen patch governance and rapid response protocols: Adopt structured patch management programs that minimize the time between vulnerability disclosure and deployment, supported by routine security validation testing.

What UltraViolet Cyber is Doing

• Monitoring new and historical CVEs from a community sentiment standpoint while maintaining the highest levels of vigilance for novel threats that impact enterprise environments.
• Parsing available victim dump data for any social, financial, business, or technical relations to UltraViolet Clients and partner organizations.
• Aggregating threat intelligence from myriad sources and applying the most up-to-date knowledge to proactive threat hunting and response.
  
  

DOWNLOAD THE PDF REPORT

TIDE Team Analysis

A recently discovered zero-day vulnerability in Google Chrome, tracked as CVE-2025-2783, has been actively exploited in a targeted espionage campaign that highlights the growing sophistication of browser-based attacks. The flaw allowed threat actors to escape Chrome’s sandbox environment, execute arbitrary code, and ultimately install advanced spyware on compromised systems. The campaign, referred to as ForumTroll, primarily targeted entities in Russia and Belarus, including media outlets, research organizations, government agencies, and financial institutions. Its precision and operational discipline indicate that it was not a criminal monetization effort but rather a strategic surveillance operation conducted by an actor with state-level resources or professional offensive tooling.

The vulnerability itself stemmed from improper handling of Windows pseudo-handles through the DuplicateHandle API, which enabled attackers to duplicate restricted process handles and escalate privileges. By bypassing the browser’s sandbox protections, the attackers could execute arbitrary code on the host operating system. The exploit was triggered through carefully designed phishing emails that contained short-lived, personalized links leading to malicious websites. When accessed using a vulnerable version of Chrome, these sites verified the visitor’s browser type before delivering the payload. Google patched the flaw in version 134.0.6998.178, but the exploit had already been in circulation for several months, giving adversaries a significant window of opportunity to compromise unpatched systems.

Once the vulnerability was exploited, the attackers deployed a loader that installed a remote access backdoor known as LeetAgent. This malware provided the operators with broad control over infected systems, including command execution, process management, data exfiltration, and key-logging. It also featured mechanisms for persistence through COM hijacking and extensive anti-analysis techniques designed to evade detection. In some cases, LeetAgent acted as a delivery platform for a more advanced spyware family called Dante, which used encrypted modules, virtual machine evasion, and self-removal capabilities. The combination of these components enabled the attackers to maintain long-term surveillance on high-value targets, collect sensitive data, and operate with stealth over extended periods.

From a defensive perspective, this attack underscores the fragility of sandboxing as a security control when confronted by well-funded adversaries. Sandboxes were long considered reliable containment layers that prevented browser exploits from impacting the underlying system, yet this case illustrates how attackers can identify narrow implementation flaws to break through these boundaries. It also reveals how the browser itself—widely trusted and constantly active across all enterprise environments—has become a critical attack vector requiring the same defensive rigor as endpoints or servers. The effectiveness of this campaign depended on its ability to compromise systems through seemingly benign user actions, rendering traditional user awareness measures insufficient on their own.

A subtle but important aspect of this incident lies in the connection to Memento Labs, the surveillance vendor formerly known as Hacking Team. The group has a history of developing intrusion and monitoring tools used by government clients and intelligence services. Its involvement in this campaign suggests that the line between private surveillance technology providers and state-sponsored cyber operations continues to blur. Memento Labs’ re-emergence also illustrates how commercial spyware development persists despite prior exposure and sanctions, with offensive tools being repackaged and redeployed in new campaigns under different operational names.

The presence of a commercial spyware vendor within an active zero-day exploitation campaign raises significant supply-chain and policy concerns. Tools originally developed for lawful interception are being repurposed for covert cyber espionage, expanding access to nation-grade capabilities for actors who operate outside formal state structures. This commercialization of advanced intrusion techniques increases the likelihood that similar vulnerabilities will be exploited across other sectors, regions, and industries. Even organizations outside the immediate geographic focus of this campaign should recognize that the same exploits and malware infrastructure can be reused in future operations with different targets.

Organizations should respond to this development by reinforcing browser security management at both the infrastructure and policy level. Immediate patching of all Chrome and Chromium-based browsers is essential to mitigate this specific vulnerability. Beyond patching, enterprises should strengthen network filtering to detect anomalous URL patterns, monitor for signs of sandbox escape behavior such as handle duplication or abnormal process spawning, and isolate browsing activity on high-risk systems. Browser privilege restrictions, strict application controls, and continuous behavioral monitoring must form the foundation of future defensive strategies. Given the demonstrated capabilities of the adversary, even small delays in patch deployment could result in successful compromise.

The broader significance of this incident lies in what it reveals about the changing character of modern cyber threats. Espionage campaigns are increasingly relying on browser exploitation and commercially developed spyware rather than traditional malware distribution channels. The combination of a zero-day exploit, precision targeting, and modular surveillance tools signals a new phase in the cyber threat landscape—one where advanced adversaries exploit trusted applications to achieve persistence and data access. For leadership, this represents a call to action: proactive patch management, browser isolation, and threat intelligence integration are now essential elements of organizational resilience against this evolving class of threats.

Why It Matters

This threat matters because it represents a fundamental shift in how adversaries gain access to high-value systems. Historically, attackers relied on social engineering or malicious attachments to compromise endpoints, but the exploitation of CVE-2025-2783 in Chrome demonstrates that even fully patched, enterprise-grade browsers can serve as silent gateways for intrusion. The ability to bypass sandbox protections—a core containment mechanism in modern browsers—undermines one of the last remaining layers of client-side defense. By leveraging a zero-day vulnerability and embedding spyware into ordinary web traffic, attackers can compromise users through nothing more than a single website visit, turning the browser itself into an espionage platform. This marks a strategic evolution in cyber operations, where threat actors target trusted applications that users depend on every day, blurring the line between legitimate software behavior and malicious compromise.

Beyond its technical implications, this incident underscores the expanding role of commercial spyware vendors like Memento Labs in shaping the modern threat landscape. The reuse of sophisticated, privately developed surveillance tools within active zero-day campaigns reveals a thriving marketplace for offensive capabilities that were once exclusive to nation-states. As these tools proliferate, the barrier to entry for conducting complex espionage operations decreases, enabling smaller or less-resourced adversaries to achieve strategic effects once reserved for intelligence agencies. For leadership, this means that espionage-grade attacks are no longer theoretical or distant—they are practical, scalable, and increasingly commoditized. The convergence of commercial spyware, zero-day exploitation, and browser-based delivery mechanisms has created a threat ecosystem that can target any organization, regardless of industry or geography, demanding a renewed focus on proactive defense and continuous visibility.

How to Respond

• Strictly adhere to CyberSecurity Fundamentals and ensure all personnel undergo annual phishing and social engineering training. Speak with your UltraViolet Cyber TAM Representative to schedule a live phishing engagement.
• Ensure all Chrome browsers on Android, Linux, MacOS and Windows are patched to 0 or above; On iOS patch to version 142.0 or above.
• Ensure critical infrastructure running on bare-metal and virtualized Windows Servers, such as Domain Controllers or OT/ICS management services, do not have a browser installed locally.
• Perform annual tech refresh reviews to gain a holistic understanding of your infrastructure. Speak with your UltraViolet Cyber TAM Representative to schedule a Red Team or Purple Team engagement to gain insight into the vulnerabilities in your environment.

What UltraViolet Cyber is Doing

• Monitoring new and historical CVEs from a community sentiment standpoint while maintaining the highest levels of vigilance for novel threats that impact enterprise environments.
• Parsing available victim dump data for any social, financial, business, or technical relations to UltraViolet Clients and partner organizations.
• Aggregating threat intelligence from myriad sources and applying the most up-to-date knowledge to proactive threat hunting and response.